Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:04:49 -0700
From:      Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
To:        Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
Cc:        Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OpenVPN and policy routing
Message-ID:  <CAHu1Y71a4=DPEKJCMV_m-WAe3kv=_NWb8o7mKxpdY5U=zTif2A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c1e380a2-7b11-7143-f05a-0589a8bd4a6f@netfence.it>
References:  <20170330032222.GA18053@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <81f24563-1abb-e804-d2a3-7fa772a0c78d@netfence.it> <20170330074615.GA25049@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <c1e380a2-7b11-7143-f05a-0589a8bd4a6f@netfence.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I use different FIBs in the ipfw ruleset to accomplish policy based
routing, including via a tun interface.

- M

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote:

> On 03/30/17 09:46, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> Will "ipfw fwd" do the trick? I could "ipfw fwd" the packets into the
>> tun0 interface, but will OpenVPN understand that?
>>
>
> Never tried this, sorry.
>
>  bye
>         av.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



--=20
"Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no
wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five hundred."

- The Mah=C4=81bh=C4=81rata



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y71a4=DPEKJCMV_m-WAe3kv=_NWb8o7mKxpdY5U=zTif2A>