Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:02:29 +0100
From:      Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
To:        Davide Italiano <davide.italiano@gmail.com>
Cc:        George Neville-Neil <gnn@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Fabien Thomas <fabient@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Intel Sandy Bridge support for hwpmc
Message-ID:  <CAJ-FndCbQkPnzudOc2q8jrc_TKJ2AgoWYFG5BbQxw=wguuzmpA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACYV=-HbAjh9bVCM46zNiKXtx28ffKz4N_xfycCigJD9o=JH5A@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CACYV=-HbThQJ2=fpDezUMC7eue9AFxzQfE%2BATGBi-3%2BCcOW1JQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACYV=-HbAjh9bVCM46zNiKXtx28ffKz4N_xfycCigJD9o=JH5A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/11/13 Davide Italiano <davide.italiano@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano
> <davide.italiano@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Good evening folks.
>> During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to
>> hwpmc. Until now, the most recent Intel processor microarchitecture
>> supported was Westmere.
>> Testing is appreciated, in order to see if there's something that have
>> to be fixed.
>> You can find the diff here: http://davit.altervista.rg/hwpmc_sandy_bridge.diff
>>
>> I'd like to thanks a lot attilio@ that helped me to fix a bug and gnn@
>> and fabient@ for the useful suggestions.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Davide
>>
>
> Sorry, bad link. It should be:
> http://davit.altervista.org/hwpmc_sandy_bridge.diff

I can perform some small cleanups and likely test it too.

If Fabien or George can review it I'm fine with committing as long as
all that is settled.

Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-FndCbQkPnzudOc2q8jrc_TKJ2AgoWYFG5BbQxw=wguuzmpA>