Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:27:10 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ENXIOing non-present battery Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=c0f06JYs%2BK1GvCYjoSWdYqm3z_uti=6f6qEirQQ7Vzw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54862F5E.4040909@freebsd.org> References: <54840781.70603@freebsd.org> <CAJ-Vmokzdep71ty_ctvAEQSDvCsOQj15wQ8p96%2B3fCBtr8dvYg@mail.gmail.com> <54862F5E.4040909@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What's the output of acpiconf -i0 and acpiconf -i1? I wonder if changing 'state' to something else would keep everything happy. -adrian On 8 December 2014 at 15:08, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 12/07/14 08:03, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> How's this work on other systems? KDE on Linux doesn't lose its mind >> if the second battery is totally flat. > > I just booted Ubuntu 14.04, and both "batteries" appear in /proc/acpi/battery; > but BAT1 just shows "present: no" without any statistics, and the GUI shows > the correct state for the single present battery. > > -- > Colin Percival > Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve > Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=c0f06JYs%2BK1GvCYjoSWdYqm3z_uti=6f6qEirQQ7Vzw>