Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:41:04 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Thomas Zander <thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is ATH_ENABLE_11N supposed to work on 9-stable? Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=fzxfSZhmCzzQog%2BvnXw5LS%2Bh32PUDLaVOdSNTHcNiGg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFU734yKTSW94MESwiHc5VC0==%2Ba4RdG47QYRxV9ZNY_Xm-T_Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFU734yKTSW94MESwiHc5VC0==%2Ba4RdG47QYRxV9ZNY_Xm-T_Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nope. It's a -10 thing. -adrian On 14 July 2013 08:01, Thomas Zander <thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > from the mailing lists I couldn't figure out whether 11n is supposed > to work on stable since the existing mail threads seem to focus on > current exclusively. > > And since the option exists in the stable kernel code as well, albeit > neither in GENERIC nor in NOTES, I thought I could give it a try > anyway. > > I had some partial success. Test in station mode, WPA2 associated > properly, light traffic (browsing the web) seems to work okay as well. > However as soon as I try to really push some data through it, e.g. > rsync large files, the card drops all network traffic until I > disassociate and re-associate with the access point again (e.g. netif > restart). > > If 11N is just not ready in -stable yet, it's not a problem, but if > it's supposed to work, I'd begin to collect debugging information. > > So, is it supposed to work on a 9-stable as of today? > > Best regards > Riggs > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=fzxfSZhmCzzQog%2BvnXw5LS%2Bh32PUDLaVOdSNTHcNiGg>