Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 13:38:14 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: APU2C4 information (was Re: 11.0-RC2 and 12-CURRENT won't boot on apu2c4) Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=qDFfeGXtA0GcK3zu%2BjX74q7PoMtEQ=ovmEhdfcwfkHQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20160903153637.138e2d39.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <f764e89a-e6bc-e34c-54d8-1e1c1f50b6fc@posteo.de> <bad1b6d0-e581-10eb-b904-109b3a678318@FreeBSD.org> <1472900114.23139.2.camel@posteo.de> <7CC5E580-10DC-4688-B6CE-8C1337EC227B@freebsd.org> <be5f2a11-edba-697e-4428-8c0d35f3feba@madpilot.net> <FC008017-D203-4CD8-A071-B9187DC62395@fh-muenster.de> <20160903151100.6e375bed.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <51989ee8-d2dc-4249-cea9-5d9d7cf793ef@madpilot.net> <20160903153637.138e2d39.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, no, ar988x is 11ac, and i haven't finished the port. -a On 3 September 2016 at 06:36, O. Hartmann <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wro= te: > Am Sat, 3 Sep 2016 15:25:17 +0200 > Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> schrieb: > >> On 09/03/16 15:11, O. Hartmann wrote: >> > Am Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:01:15 +0200 >> > Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> schrieb: >> > >> >>> On 03 Sep 2016, at 13:24, Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On 09/03/16 13:08, Michael Tuexen wrote: >> >>>>> On 03 Sep 2016, at 12:55, Oliver B=C3=B6ttcher <oliver.boettcher@p= osteo.de> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Am Freitag, den 02.09.2016, 22:09 +0200 schrieb Guido Falsi: >> >>>>>> I think you should open a bug report and post the number here so >> >>>>>> feedback about this can be collected there. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Bug report filed [1]. I just noticed that the serial console is no= t >> >>>>> working on >=3D11.0 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The update from 10.3 to 11.0 worked but has no output opon boot in >> >>>>> 11.0. >> >>>> I'm running FreeBSD head on an apu2c4 without any problems, the ser= ial >> >>>> console is working. >> >>>> >> >>>> However, I do have >> >>>> >> >>>> console=3D"comconsole" >> >>>> comconsole_speed=3D"115200" >> >>>> >> >>>> in /boot/loader.conf. >> >>>> It is not using ZFS and it is booting from an m-SATA SSD. Which boo= t device >> >>>> are you using? >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> SO it looks like a default configuration issue. >> >>> >> >>> This can explain why my custom nanobsd images work, I have a console >> >>> configuration in loader there. >> >> The default console speed of the apu2 is 115200, the one from FreeBSD= isn't. >> >> Without the above setting you have to use 115200 first to see the BIO= S output >> >> and than change the speed to whatever FreeBSD uses as its default. Us= ing >> >> the above settings you can use the same speed for both. >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Michael >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebs= d.org" >> >> >> > >> > I do not want to "kidnap/threadnap" the thread, but I have a question:= My APU 2C4 is >> > underway and I'm curious about whether it would boot via UEFI or not? >> >> I don't think it has UEFI support. These boards come with a traditional >> old style BIOS. > > All right. It is coreboot, if not mistaken and I read something about a U= EFI support > there, but forgot whether this is futural agenda or real by now. > >> >> > >> > I also ordered mine with a Atheros AR9882 based WiFi card and I'm also= curious about >> > whether this chip is working with 12-CURRENT or not. The AR9880, more = powerful and >> > newer, seems also available for this APU, but it is more expensive and= I didn't took >> > the risc ... > > I checked the WiFi webpage at FreeBSD.org and these specific adapters are= not mentioned > there. The support of AP capable WiFi adapters is rather limited (to Athe= ros types), on > Linux, more adapters seem to provide the AP functionality. Therefore, my = question. > >> >> I don't know this device. Atheros cards have very good support in >> general through the ath(4) driver, if you know the PCI ID of the device >> you can check in the sources if it's known. >> > I'll check and report back ;-) > > Thank you very much. > > Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=qDFfeGXtA0GcK3zu%2BjX74q7PoMtEQ=ovmEhdfcwfkHQ>