Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 18:09:46 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> Cc: Thomas Zander <riggs@freebsd.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, =?ISO-8859-1?B?Qy4gQmVyZ3N0cvZt?= <cbergstrom@pathscale.com>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: opteron a1100 arm Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokC9qHiKEE-pFTgcaZPE3fp09h20q-t_K8EbVpRnUsiSw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <A0C73AA0-3979-4B61-8AFC-C5C5E41D21DE@netgate.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401311911120.2427@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1391538649.19169.79261269.3C5F49D1@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAFU734xXWyc_TqBJ7e4MhD2nB01BAejR_1vT9%2B_5Ar5mJncncA@mail.gmail.com> <493DEB39-C4B4-409E-B8B2-B1B11E013754@netgate.com> <20140204223528.GF23872@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <52F16BA4.4060202@pathscale.com> <60985.1391554164@critter.freebsd.dk> <52F179C6.2050400@freebsd.org> <A0C73AA0-3979-4B61-8AFC-C5C5E41D21DE@netgate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4 February 2014 16:35, Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 5:37 PM, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> On 02/04/14 16:49, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>> In message <52F16BA4.4060202@pathscale.com>, =?UTF-8?B?IkMuIEJlcmdzdHLDtm0i?= w
>>> rites:
>>>
>>>> Think about how much power interconnects takes, PCIe and everything else..
>>> Not to mention the raw savings of avoiding all the crap that has
>>> been nailed inexpertly onto the X86 platform over the years...
>>>
>>> Did you notice that "X86 arduino" Intel just launched ?
>>>
>>> Does anybody but me cringe at the thought of an Arduino with UEFI, ACPI,
>>> microcode updates and SMM ticking away in the background to make sure
>>> it doesn't run too hot ?
>>>
>>
>> This AMD platform has UEFI and ACPI, so that's at least 2 out of 4...
>> -Nathan
>
> The "X86 arduino" ("Gallileo") has a Quark 1100 SoC running at 400MHz. It implements a 32-bit Pentium instruction set and has a TDP of 1.9W - 2.2W.
>
> I don't think it's going to "run too hot", and yes it runs SMM, UEFI and ACPI-compatible sleep states.
We'd still have to port to that platform.
I'd give it go if someone would ship me one. :)
-a
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokC9qHiKEE-pFTgcaZPE3fp09h20q-t_K8EbVpRnUsiSw>