Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:02:45 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org>, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> Subject: Re: Change default VFS timestamp precision? Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmokkc-p4-keMExxT%2BwyjugA8zYRS2XRv6VucWnfH0iw_Pw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70073.1418837301@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <201412161348.41219.jhb@freebsd.org> <20141216233844.GA1490@stack.nl> <2034186.iLaW9EGnEt@ralph.baldwin.cx> <70073.1418837301@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 December 2014 at 09:28, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > -------- > In message <2034186.iLaW9EGnEt@ralph.baldwin.cx>, John Baldwin writes: > >>My bad for not checking that further but for assuming make would be impacted. > > I think it is over 10 years ago when make(1) first started seeing > identical timestamps which wasn't. > > In most Makefiles this doesn't matter, but there are cases, in particular > in less integrated families of makefiles than our own. Surely there has to be better ways of doing this stuff. Computers keep getting faster; it wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility that we could see a compiler read, compile and spit out a .o inside of a millisecond. (Obviously not C++, but..) -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmokkc-p4-keMExxT%2BwyjugA8zYRS2XRv6VucWnfH0iw_Pw>