Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:11:09 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: Fehmi Noyan ISI <fnoyanisi@yahoo.com> Cc: Freebsd Wireless <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Using net80211/IEEE80211_C_BITS macro Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmokwaz6AcbS=Yqc8ExxcV%2BOTR-hd5eN3Gfq%2B0TTVyOpCnw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <980351195.1573665.1479336792289@mail.yahoo.com> References: <980351195.1573665.1479336792289.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <980351195.1573665.1479336792289@mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! Uhm, we could totally break out more bits into separate header files if including ieee80211_var.h doesn't work for you. a On 16 November 2016 at 14:53, Fehmi Noyan ISI via freebsd-wireless <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hiya, > > I am working on an API (hopefully will post something about it soon) that= , beyond other stuff, checks wlan driver capabilities (just like ifconfig(1= ) does). However, the capabilities macro, which is IEEE80211_C_BITS, is def= ined in sys/net80211/ieee80211_var.h and I am not sure whether #include'ing= ieee80211_var.h just for this macro is a good idea or not. > > I have noticed that IEEE80211_C_BITS is re-defined in sbin/ifconfig/ifiee= e80211.c to be used by list_capabilities() function; does this not require = update of IEEE80211_C_BITS macro in multiple source files? > > What would be the best approach to use IEEE80211_C_BITS in my source file= ; including ieee80211_var.h or re-defining the macro in the source file (si= milar to ifconfig(1))? > > Thanks > Fehmi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmokwaz6AcbS=Yqc8ExxcV%2BOTR-hd5eN3Gfq%2B0TTVyOpCnw>