Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:24:46 -0400 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> Cc: "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CPU underload Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomzkG8ZB0h1Qc=Oeny2ZOzQg1UirUprM_gmMy64F5ZRYw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5635148B.2070307@grosbein.net> References: <56348063.3090508@grosbein.net> <56348239.3050701@grosbein.net> <CAJ-Vmok%2BgKXcpzpxNCBhxX8sYSh%2BQO7OaeojB4MCufO%2BA4zceg@mail.gmail.com> <563500FC.8020201@grosbein.net> <CAJ-Vmo=EpmG6OJxq_v_mqKMF48h_B3K7vKqnnaKAi3x1s-uaWQ@mail.gmail.com> <5635148B.2070307@grosbein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OK, so those messages are expected when you run hwpmc. Sigh, I should just rate limit that message and make it a counter. (I had to comment it out here.) Do you get those unaligned fixup messages when you're not running hwpmc? (sysctl kern.msgbuf_clear=1 and then retest without running pmcstat, etc.) During the test, what's the latency between your two test boxes? Try a ping from FTP client->server and see. Thanks, -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomzkG8ZB0h1Qc=Oeny2ZOzQg1UirUprM_gmMy64F5ZRYw>