Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:44:08 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: taskqueue_drain_all Message-ID: <CAJ-VmonjLcp4=A%2BdRShaGVXhe67VaVtR5kY2DJcZUBOOYW8KoA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5295032B.4010200@FreeBSD.org> References: <525519F1.3050703@FreeBSD.org> <5295032B.4010200@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On 26 November 2013 12:23, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > on 09/10/2013 11:55 Andriy Gapon said the following: >> >> I would like to propose to extend taskqueue API with taskqueue_drain_all. >> A potential use case: I have a private taskqueue, several kinds of tasks get >> executed via it and then I want to make sure that all of them are completed. >> Obviously, I have a way to ensure that no new ones get enqueued. > > Provided I do not get any no-s or why-s I am going to commit the following > slightly different version soon: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/taskqueue_drain_all.diff > > P.S. > taskqueue_drain_running introduced in the above patch could also be used to add > wait semantics to taskqueue_block. > So you're going to keep taskqueue_drain() semantics of running the tasks if they're queued? -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonjLcp4=A%2BdRShaGVXhe67VaVtR5kY2DJcZUBOOYW8KoA>