Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:28:08 +0000 From: Justin Cormack <justin@specialbusservice.com> To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Bug 194828] [test] lib.libc.sys.getcontext_test.setcontext_link fails on amd64, not i386 Message-ID: <CAK4o1WwnhBAcHqoLuL78DW=3ffn-WEo8=fSX5CAPZcATzpUOxg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <bug-194828-32464-gV6nGjZR8b@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-194828-32464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-194828-32464-gV6nGjZR8b@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:35 AM, <bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org> wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194828 > > --- Comment #12 from Garrett Cooper,425-314-3911 <ngie@FreeBSD.org> --- > In a perfect world I would like for everything to be consistent between FreeBSD > and NetBSD, but that's not the way it should be, and that's a silly ideal to > hope for :). NetBSD dev here... I would rather that tests actually test behaviour as defined in standards, especially for eg libc tests, and indeed I have bunch of stuff to add more tests on standards compliance. So if stuff is testing implementation internals it should go away, and if NetBSDs behaviour is incorrect please file an issue, or if the test setup is not eg standards compliant please file an issue http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/sendpr.cgi?gndb=netbsd Justin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK4o1WwnhBAcHqoLuL78DW=3ffn-WEo8=fSX5CAPZcATzpUOxg>