Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 16:43:45 +0100 From: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@freebsd.org> To: FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org> Subject: Do we need FreeBSD's minor version in gcc and binutils paths? Message-ID: <CAKBkRUzUV5MEpMdE2rrmhwqwrubWcZCJku3HnH5n-maBjkQZBw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
For example, currently packages of 11.x are built on 11.1 so aarch64-gcc installs /usr/local/bin/aarch64-unknown-freebsd11.1-gcc and aarch64-binutils install /usr/local/aarch64-unknown-freebsd11.1/bin/ld This is a bit weird to see these on a 11.2 system, also causes some problem while testing alone with local-built toolchains. Does it make sense to strip the minor version in the paths? i.e. change to something like /usr/local/bin/aarch64-unknown-freebsd11-gcc I think this should be fine since we guarantee ABI stable in a stable branch. Li-Wen -- Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> https://lwhsu.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKBkRUzUV5MEpMdE2rrmhwqwrubWcZCJku3HnH5n-maBjkQZBw>