Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:04:15 -0700 From: Nick Rogers <ncrogers@gmail.com> To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" <jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "Clement Hermann \(nodens\)" <nodens2099@gmail.com> Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3 Message-ID: <CAKOb=YZAwcQyHu=unNMGszFU5VqPB-LxS3we_c8y8d6jKBq6nA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFOYbc==t%2B=riaMpQiWg0dg=3QgsCOnsiBxTBqq%2BW08nGra6MA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAKOb=YamkU=fPOMbe-WpcjRL2it1ox75vJ0rkMocSySABF2RFw@mail.gmail.com> <1364561471.47223.YahooMailClassic@web121602.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D65687D46B19E@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> <CAFOYbc==t%2B=riaMpQiWg0dg=3QgsCOnsiBxTBqq%2BW08nGra6MA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote: > Fortunately, Barney doesn't speak for me, or for Intel, and I've long ago > realized its pointless to > attempt anything like a fair conversation with him. The only thing he's ever > contributed is slander > and pseudo-critique... another poison thread I'm done with. > > Jack Multiqueue or not, I would appreciate any help with this thread's original issue. Whether or not its the ideal thing to do, I cannot simply just replace the NICs with an em(4) variant, as I have hundreds of customers/systems already in production running 8.3 and relying on the igb driver + ALTQ. I need to be able to upgrade these systems to 9.1 without making hardware changes. > > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Pieper, Jeffrey E > <jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] >> On Behalf Of Barney Cordoba >> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 5:51 AM >> To: Jack Vogel; Nick Rogers >> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Clement Hermann (nodens) >> Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3 >> >> >> >> --- On Thu, 3/28/13, Nick Rogers <ncrogers@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > From: Nick Rogers <ncrogers@gmail.com> >> > Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3 >> > To: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com> >> > Cc: "Barney Cordoba" <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com>, "Clement Hermann >> > (nodens)" <nodens2099@gmail.com>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" >> > <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> >> > Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013, 9:29 PM >> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Jack >> > Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > Have been kept fairly busy with other matters, one >> > thing I could do short >> > > term is >> > > change the defines in igb the way I did in the em >> > driver so you could still >> > > define >> > > the older if_start entry. Right now those are based on >> > OS version and so you >> > > will >> > > automatically get if_transmit, but I could change it to >> > be IGB_LEGACY_TX or >> > > so, >> > > and that could be defined in the Makefile. >> > > >> > > Would this help? >> > >> > I'm currently using ALTQ successfully with the em driver, so >> > if igb >> > behaved the same with respect to using if_start instead of >> > if_transmit >> > when ALTQ is in play, that would be great. I do not >> > completely >> > understand the change you propose as I am not very familiar >> > with the >> > driver internals. Any kind of patch or extra >> > Makefile/make.conf >> > definition that would allow me to build a 9-STABLE kernel >> > with an igb >> > driver that works again with ALTQ, ASAP, would be much >> > appreciated. >> > >> > > >> > > Jack >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Nick Rogers <ncrogers@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Gleb >> > Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 03:31:19PM -0800, >> > Jack Vogel wrote: >> > >> >> J> UH, maybe asking the owner of the >> > driver would help :) >> > >> >> J> >> > >> >> J> ... and no, I've never been aware of >> > doing anything to stop >> > >> >> supporting >> > >> >> altq >> > >> >> J> so you wouldn't see any commits. If >> > there's something in the altq >> > >> >> code >> > >> >> or >> > >> >> J> support (which I have nothing to do >> > with) that caused this no-one >> > >> >> informed >> > >> >> J> me. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Switching from if_start to if_transmit >> > effectively disables ALTQ >> > >> >> support. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> AFAIR, there is some magic implemented in >> > other drivers that makes them >> > >> >> modern (that means using if_transmit), but >> > still capable to switch to >> > >> >> queueing >> > >> >> mode if SIOCADDALTQ was casted upon them. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > Oh, hmmm, I'll look into the matter after my >> > vacation. >> > >> > >> > >> > Jack >> > >> >> > >> Has there been any progress on resolving this >> > issue? I recently ran >> > >> into this problem upgrading my servers from 8.3 to >> > 9.1-RELEASE and am >> > >> wondering what the latest recommendation is. I've >> > used ALTQ and igb >> > >> successfully for years and it is unfortunate it no >> > longer works. >> > >> Appreciate any advice. >> > >> >> > >> >Do yourself a favor and either get a cheap dual port 82571 card or >> >2 cards and disable the IGB ports. The igb driver is defective, and until >> >they back out the new, untested multi-queue stuff you're just neutering >> >your system trying to use it. >> > >> >Frankly this project made a huge mistake by moving forward with multi >> >queue just for the sake of saying that you support it; without having >> >any credible plan for implementing it. That nonsense that Bill Macy did >> >should have been tarballed up and deposited in the trash folder. The >> >biggest mess in programming history. >> > >> >That being said, the solution is not to hack the igb driver; its to make >> >ALTQ if_transmit compatible, which shouldn't be all that difficult. >> > >> >BC >> >> I may be misunderstanding what you are saying, but if the solution is, as >> you say "not to hack the igb driver", then how is it defective in this case? >> Or are you just directing vitriol toward Intel? Multi-queue is working fine >> in igb. >> >> Jeff >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKOb=YZAwcQyHu=unNMGszFU5VqPB-LxS3we_c8y8d6jKBq6nA>