Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:13:54 +0300 From: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> To: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>, meka@tilda.center Subject: Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system) Message-ID: <CALH631=v4aWhFNDjZcnmjPnzFyZGhg%2BPuRmShx8TFvF6hPbnJQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2hAUiWdGPtpaCJLPZB%2Bj2yzNw5DSjUmkwTi%2B%2BmyemehCA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOtMX2hAUiWdGPtpaCJLPZB%2Bj2yzNw5DSjUmkwTi%2B%2BmyemehCA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 7:51=E2=80=AFPM Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> w= rote: > To > summarize, the cost is that it would double our build times. Would it? From what I remember, a lot of rust's build time comes from building its own LLVM. Can we reuse our base LLVM for Rust-in-base?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631=v4aWhFNDjZcnmjPnzFyZGhg%2BPuRmShx8TFvF6hPbnJQ>