Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:05:24 +0400
From:      Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org>
To:        Tomasz CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info>
Cc:        freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH and /usr/local
Message-ID:  <CALH631ky5P8dd9TCKska-WaQGnVxuuD%2BLb8Xd1Vshya2Vz-kWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM8r67DO%2BaiAR7FbtCzOFQKZqbOMV8Xubz9ERCtVujRj3NpxCw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAM8r67DO%2BaiAR7FbtCzOFQKZqbOMV8Xubz9ERCtVujRj3NpxCw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:50 AM Tomasz CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> wrote:

> Hello world :-)
>
> I am porting LimeSuite to FreeBSD. Local patch fixes missing
> "/usr/local/" path in CMakeLists.txt so the package now builds fine on
> FreeBSD. On Linux probably most of the libraries and includes are
> located in /usr/ do problem does not exist.
>
> Upstream has some objections to accept this patch and considers
> "/usr/local" a non-standard path [1]. But they propose to use
> CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH to add "/usr/local". This however does not seem to
> be supported in Ports (yet?).
>
> The question is how to tell CMake about "/usr/local/include" without
> source code modification? :-)
>
> Below is the proposed patch:
>
> > @@ -171,6 +171,11 @@ if (ENABLE_NEW_GAIN_BEHAVIOUR)
>      add_definitions(-DNEW_GAIN_BEHAVIOUR)
>  endif()
>
> +if (CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME MATCHES "BSD")
> +    include_directories("/usr/local/include")
>

This is most certainly a wrong thing to do. Instead of simply adding
-I/usr/local/include everywhere, you should fix problems for each
dependency that the software requires.

What error do you get without your patch?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631ky5P8dd9TCKska-WaQGnVxuuD%2BLb8Xd1Vshya2Vz-kWw>