Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 10:32:13 +0300 From: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> To: Xavier Humbert <xavier@groumpf.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Ports Makefile rules install vs do-install Message-ID: <CALH631mhaud-1m0338EeseZiLQ7QgPGQKjD6n7U1Cgi2LBAbqg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <78bc1f34-ea47-a5b2-e9d6-4b4f1a218a51@groumpf.org> References: <78bc1f34-ea47-a5b2-e9d6-4b4f1a218a51@groumpf.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--000000000000635e6405c35ee19b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:24 AM Xavier Humbert <xavier@groumpf.org> wrote: > The problem is : > * target "do-install" is not invoked if I call make install. > * calling manually "make do-install" stages the port correctly. > * if I rename this target to "install", it complains about > "work/rudder-agent-6.2.7/Makefile" missing, despite the flag NO_BUILD= yes > * the pkg-plist is conform > * however, the target "do-test" is correctly called by "make test" > > I've carefully read the Porter's Handbook, and can't see where my > mistake is. I'm not a Makefile guru. > > Thanks for help, > > Regards, > > Xavier > > -- > Xavier HUMBERT - Unix/Win/MacOSX Sysadmin/Network Senior Engineer > https://www.amdh.fr > Do you have .include <bsd.port.mk> at the end of your Makefile? --000000000000635e6405c35ee19b--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631mhaud-1m0338EeseZiLQ7QgPGQKjD6n7U1Cgi2LBAbqg>