Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 07:11:51 +0300 From: Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer [it is more complicated then that for aarch64] Message-ID: <CALH631mm8cdL1A9TaumnENk9OGCm=PEfMDH6uSvjKaUDuzg8Hw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <366E27FD-FA5B-4BF8-B6C4-6C495DB289C5@yahoo.com> References: <8E2FBAD3-EF6F-4D99-A340-21F8FD19AE0F@yahoo.com> <FA9C7841-6D61-4285-AC6D-46328CBC56D2@yahoo.com> <C7BBEC76-228F-4F9E-A5F9-86E9F53372FD@yahoo.com> <D3C2F75D-838B-47E9-B125-71104A3C16EA@yahoo.com> <CD66A7B2-422B-40FE-BB17-145032DBA46F@FreeBSD.org> <84FBBAF8-025E-4B9D-9797-51735567A8DB@yahoo.com> <B295D1CB-E47D-4359-A79A-986213E7AFCE@yahoo.com> <366E27FD-FA5B-4BF8-B6C4-6C495DB289C5@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 2:44 AM Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > > So: 2 min 31 sec or so difference for overall somewhat over an > hour, i.e., 151 sec or so. That is under 1 sec per package > built. If the slowdown comes from handling shlib provides/requires, then this obviously depends on the amount of dependencies of a given package. It might be as fast as before for a package with just handful of required shlibs, but get exponentially worse for giant ports with a lot of deps.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631mm8cdL1A9TaumnENk9OGCm=PEfMDH6uSvjKaUDuzg8Hw>