Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 01:24:53 +0300 From: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com> To: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, Sergei Mamonov <mamonov@fastvps.ru> Subject: Re: ZFS subvolume support inside Bhyve vm Message-ID: <CALgsdbfD8QVSM471m4NZtNfW%2Byv0G_04Gx_%2BydDBwpDp4_5GZw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <56E1F098.7050501@freebsd.org> References: <CALgsdbcXxAnfkKnU9CuOE-pj0sJJpQ7-XFd6R0bFEeKB-maDRw@mail.gmail.com> <56E1F098.7050501@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello! Songs interesting! But I could not find any information regarding p9fs state in FreeBSD and their protocol overhead. Coukd you aim me to more details? Thanks! On Friday, 11 March 2016, Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org> wrote: > As we have support for ZFS on almost all platforms (I'm speaking about >> Linux and FreeBSD) we could run ZFS subvolumes inside vm's without so much >> pain. >> >> So this approach looks very promising and I would like to talk about it ;) >> > > To be clear on this: do you mean something like ZFS DMU passthru to a > guest ? There's already host filesystem access to bhyve with NFS, and the > p9fs patch. > > later, > > Peter. > > -- Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALgsdbfD8QVSM471m4NZtNfW%2Byv0G_04Gx_%2BydDBwpDp4_5GZw>