Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:36:13 +0100
From:      Tomasz CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info>
To:        Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de>
Cc:        Martin Simmons <martin@lispworks.com>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl
Message-ID:  <CAM8r67B6bp6KJH20u-NfwwZEYW6GDH%2BWwRTJqiCjVoWgQQBJOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2AF24633-7E9F-4B92-8E99-6A81CD9D3AF8@lastsummer.de>
References:  <20201209230300.03251CA1@freefall.freebsd.org> <20201211064628.GM31099@funkthat.com> <202012111138.0BBBc2Eq006002@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <2AF24633-7E9F-4B92-8E99-6A81CD9D3AF8@lastsummer.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:44 PM Franco Fichtner wrote:
> > On 11. Dec 2020, at 12:38 PM, Martin Simmons <martin@lispworks.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:46:28 -0800, John-Mark Gurney said:
> >> What are peoples thoughts on how to address the support mismatch between
> >> FreeBSD and OpenSSL?  And how to address it?
> > Maybe it would help a little if the packages on pkg.FreeBSD.org all used the
> > pkg version of OpenSSL?  Currently, it looks like you have build your own
> > ports if you want that.
>
> This pretty much breaks LibreSSL ports usage for binary package consumers.

Why not switch to LibreSSL as default? :-)

-- 
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAM8r67B6bp6KJH20u-NfwwZEYW6GDH%2BWwRTJqiCjVoWgQQBJOg>