Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:30:21 -0700
From:      mdf@FreeBSD.org
To:        freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   extattr_set_* return type
Message-ID:  <CAMBSHm9kBuE4H5VDT3iHTsis24-J3nj8hhLBjOX3DS4k5qZRKA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Despite the man page correctly describing the return value for
extattr_set_*, I thought recently that they returned 0/-1 for
success/failure, not the number of bytes written, like write(2).  This is
because extattr_set_* is declared as returning an int, not an ssize_t.
 Both extattr_get and extattr_list return ssize_t, so this is inconsistent.

The patch at
http://people.freebsd.org/~mdf/0001-Fix-return-type-of-extattr_set_-and-fix-rmextattr-8-.patchfixes
this.  It compiles but it's untested.

I don't think any compat shims are needed, since an old application will
still sign extend and this will work (it's very unlikely anyone does
extattr_set for 2GB or more).

If anyone actually uses extattr on 64-bit, please test a new kernel but old
userspace to be sure nothing is broken.  I plan to commit this next week if
I don't hear otherwise.

Thanks,
matthew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMBSHm9kBuE4H5VDT3iHTsis24-J3nj8hhLBjOX3DS4k5qZRKA>