Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 01:41:42 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Herrero_Carr=C3=B3n?= <elferdo@gmail.com> To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> Cc: Andrea Brancatelli <abrancatelli@schema31.it>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11 Message-ID: <CAMwkeZzeQk6tL_fG7TJdFCt_4CWPADNaHy2VP4yEs3Mm2F77MA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20160828060601.08ea91a8@X220.alogt.com> References: <20160819073422.4292997b@X220.alogt.com> <af0fefab-69d7-f0a9-3d6d-4a9891d5a156@FreeBSD.org> <20160821144505.27c0f55d@X220.alogt.com> <827183a944ee4052649c152d65204444@schema31.it> <20160822101423.GF18643@e-new.0x20.net> <20160822120215.GV22212@zxy.spb.ru> <20160823110159.GU18643@e-new.0x20.net> <20160824045558.18c86764@X220.alogt.com> <3234db29c228879cc473deec0b09568c@schema31.it> <CAMwkeZwmhqL%2BOU4kWafMOw6gCZB1N3Zxw5n-TyJ57R_toGM1Eg@mail.gmail.com> <20160826132059.63c23ee5@X220.alogt.com> <20160828060601.08ea91a8@X220.alogt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 28/8/2016 0:06, "Erich Dollansky" <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> escribi= =C3=B3: > > Hi, > > Micheal did a plain compiler benchmark on FreeBSD 11: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Darticle&item=3Dfreebsd11-clang-gcc&= num=3D1 > > It shows clearly how slow CLang is compared to GCC. > > This is the price FreeBSD has to pay to be free of GPL in the base > system. > > Erich Very cool comparison, thanks a lot! I think gcc has a lot of knowledge and experience under its belt, a larger user base so no wonder it performs [slightly] worse. What has really surprised me has been ImageMagick, apparently because of openmp. The OpenMP stack has been contributed by intel, clang 3.4 if I recall it right. Surprising. Cheers, Fernando
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMwkeZzeQk6tL_fG7TJdFCt_4CWPADNaHy2VP4yEs3Mm2F77MA>