Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 03:38:06 -0300 From: Martin Galvan <omgalvan.86@gmail.com> To: freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org Subject: Locking a MTX_DEF inside an interrupt thread Message-ID: <CAN19L9FDgn9=UZ9E%2BhAxSQtFXtT=42zoBD0MvJwYW0_dx61nvw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi everyone! I was reading the man page on bus_setup_intr() and noticed it warned against sleeping inside an ithread routine. However, I saw a few drivers that start their ithread routines by locking a MTX_DEF mutex, which I understand will make a thread sleep if the mutex is already being held by another thread. Based on that, I'd like to ask you guys a few questions: 1) Why can't we sleep inside an ithread? Isn't being able to context-switch (and thus avoiding using spinlocks) the whole point of using a separate thread for an interrupt handler? 2) What would be the 'correct' way to write an ithread routine which uses shared resources (such as a softc)? 3) Should we fix the drivers that use MTX_DEF mutexes inside their ithreads? Thanks a lot!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN19L9FDgn9=UZ9E%2BhAxSQtFXtT=42zoBD0MvJwYW0_dx61nvw>