Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:28:10 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, Eric Joyner <erj@freebsd.org>,  Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: problem building dev/e1000
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfrciUEEyrtrx-vt%2Bb1d%2BJCphqE8xuxqAN13msG%2Bk=ZePg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50b76fd19c51acda91ca56d429b5539053ce74a9.camel@freebsd.org>
References:  <23653.56460.521599.489556@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <754B5C21-656B-4A67-BA39-50BB4AF5C0CD@gmail.com> <CAKdFRZjdR0%2BMEFhApLcV5me8Nt=R7F1yOoW34owQYne-T9Ehmg@mail.gmail.com> <652F1541-52DE-4744-8AEA-8EE6434E04E8@gmail.com> <39629f6cb41cff32b348cf5d329d425352c28464.camel@freebsd.org> <CANCZdfqWBJU_JXtE==cVX-jiseDtbKSc4FjToArnhj7dQ_p68Q@mail.gmail.com> <50b76fd19c51acda91ca56d429b5539053ce74a9.camel@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:54 PM Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 12:32 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:17 PM Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 10:53 -0800, Enji Cooper wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > HO Eric!
> > > >
> > > > iflib was a recently added requirement on stable/12 IIRC..?
> > > >
> > > > Does the manpage note this dependency, and is there an UPDATING
> > > > entry
> > > > for this change?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > -Enji
> > > >
> > >
> > > My question would be: why? If some drivers have a new dependency on
> > > iflib, why isn't that expressed in sys/conf/files and handled
> > > automatically?
> > >
> >
> > Right now we have
> >
> >  files:net/iflib.c optional ether pci iflib
> >
> > in the files file. This would need to change to
> >
> > files:net/iflib.c optional ether pci (em | igb | ...)
> >
> > but we don't have a () operator in config. Or we'd need dozens of
> > lines,
> > and the duplicate elimination code in config has been tricky (though
> > I
> > didn't check it just now).
> >
> > Warner
> >
>
> I guess the question would be how many things does '...' represent now
> and in the future?  What it would need to be, given our current
> inflexible config(8) is
>
>  net/iflib.c optional ether pci em | ether pci igb | ...
>
> So if ... is 2 or 3 more drivers, that's not so bad.  If iflib is
> eventually going to be used by dozens of drivers, even the parens would
> make for a pretty ugly solution.
>

Immediately, there's at least half a dozen. Count on there being a dozen or
two eventually.

MUST NOT RANT ABOUT CONFIG(8).

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfrciUEEyrtrx-vt%2Bb1d%2BJCphqE8xuxqAN13msG%2Bk=ZePg>