Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 19:56:18 +0200 From: Darius Mihai <dariusmihaim@gmail.com> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bhyve+windows 7 multicore performance Message-ID: <CAPj=67vMMNoG%2BYEATOD6p=cw83egvUh9SzvJLsw_rsfcprywdA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1912041720570.5885@puchar.net> References: <201912031529.xB3FTMnY035614@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1912041720570.5885@puchar.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 18:22 Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> wrote: > >>> > >>> Try 4 cores, and drop the priority boost, you may be causeing > >> > >> Well i need more cores than 4 for that VM. > >> I will try even number (10) and no nice. > > > > If 4 cores performs better than 10 cores why would you want > > performs better per thread. Not as total. > > > removing -P option improved performance a bit. Well - a large bit. > If I remember correctly, windows runs PAUSE very often when idling, so having many cores that stay idle may slow down the system since -P forces context switches when that instruction is executed. Darius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPj=67vMMNoG%2BYEATOD6p=cw83egvUh9SzvJLsw_rsfcprywdA>