Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 13:38:07 -0700 From: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, "br@freebsd.org" <br@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, marius@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atomic_testandclear_<type>, atomic_testandset_<type> Message-ID: <CAPrugNoNjcRqhhOCwVpcTLy2YrxnLhjobSKx8B0mDxNU7AM-=g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPrugNpff58zQa-Dzpqp%2BrO8KeP0o=nEELLnVLiYRmmV%2BQqgZg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPrugNpff58zQa-Dzpqp%2BrO8KeP0o=nEELLnVLiYRmmV%2BQqgZg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It turns out ck already has equivalent primitives. Pardon the noise. -M On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 12:18 Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> wrote: > The functions in the subject are both documented in atomic(9) and are > implemented by every arch except sparc64 and MIPS. I have some code in > review that uses them that I intend to commit once the various design > issues are addressed. Please implement them so that those targets can > remain part of universe. > > Thanks in advance. > -M >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPrugNoNjcRqhhOCwVpcTLy2YrxnLhjobSKx8B0mDxNU7AM-=g>