Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:46:52 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: "Wall, Stephen" <stephen.wall@redcom.com> Cc: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>, "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl Message-ID: <CAPyFy2D%2BtRvMufcyJ14Ff6srcSeGibtF%2B3ntLD6kHtfcG7V52g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <DM6PR09MB4807705DEABCF189CCAE6A87EECB0@DM6PR09MB4807.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> References: <DM6PR09MB4807705DEABCF189CCAE6A87EECB0@DM6PR09MB4807.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:43, Wall, Stephen <stephen.wall@redcom.com> wrote= : > > > A query: am I right that the patch doesn=E2=80=99t bump the OpenSSL ver= sion to 1.1.1.i ? > > That is correct. Further to that, OpenSSL 1.1.1i includes some additional, minor changes beyond the vulnerability fix. 1.1.1i is now in HEAD (as of r368472) and has been merged to stable/12.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2D%2BtRvMufcyJ14Ff6srcSeGibtF%2B3ntLD6kHtfcG7V52g>