Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:35:24 -0700 From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Initial NFS Test: Linux vs FreeBSD (769% slower) Message-ID: <CB53127E-9D0D-422A-924E-DD1C0D341646@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <7F65FF30-7BE5-4D64-9450-84C8E7FB20AD@hub.org> References: <7F65FF30-7BE5-4D64-9450-84C8E7FB20AD@hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As an appendum =85 I found this post = http://osdir.com/ml/freebsd-fs/2012-10/msg00156.html that talked about = mounting with the oldnfs option, so tried that out =85 same speed =85 On 2013-04-26, at 09:19 , Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> wrote: >=20 > Okay, I just bit the bullet and installed a Linux/Centos 6.4 system = for testing purposes. =20 >=20 > All hardware is *identical*, except that the FreeBSD server has the = nicer Intel card in it =85 the Linux is just using the onboard Broadcom. = Everything else is the same =85 same CPUs, same amount of memory, same = switch, same netapp =85 the netapp only has one filer head, so its the = same head. I created two separate volumes, but both are on the same = aggregate and the same size. >=20 > OSs: >=20 > FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #2: Thu Apr 25 18:18:18 UTC 2013 > - custom kernel, I try to compile everything I need in, what I = missed: >=20 > vs >=20 > Linux server03.openstudent.ca 2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr = 23 19:29:00 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > - CentOS 6.4 + 'yum update' >=20 >=20 > Everything is on the local drive *except* that I put /usr/local/jboss = on the NFS drive, and there is no virtualization happening anywhere =85 = everything is on the base server OS, and nothing else is running on = either of the machines. >=20 >=20 > FreeBSD start time for jBoss .. 270731ms (768% *slower*) > Linux start time for jBoss =85.=85. 35218 ms=20 >=20 > Even hitting ctl-c after the test to stop the process is 2x faster: >=20 > FreeBSD: 4207ms (169% slower) > Linux: 2486ms >=20 > Note that both systems have an equal lack of tuning =85 I wouldn't = even know *where* to start tuning Linux =85 >=20 > Here is nfsstat -m for the two systems =85 both using nfsv3, same = rsize/wsize values, all default out of the box ... >=20 > FreeBSD: > 192.168.1.1:/vol/freebsd_jboss on /usr/local/jboss-as-7.1.1.Final > = nfsv3,tcp,resvport,hard,cto,lockd,sec=3Dsys,acdirmin=3D3,acdirmax=3D60,acr= egmin=3D5,acregmax=3D60,nametimeo=3D60,negnametimeo=3D60,rsize=3D65536,wsi= ze=3D65536,readdirsize=3D32768,readahead=3D1,wcommitsize=3D5175966,timeout= =3D120,retrans=3D2 >=20 > Linux: > /usr/local/jboss-as-7.1.1.Final from 192.168.1.1:/vol/linux_jboss > Flags: = rw,relatime,vers=3D3,rsize=3D65536,wsize=3D65536,namlen=3D255,hard,proto=3D= tcp,timeo=3D600,retrans=3D2,sec=3Dsys,mountaddr=3D192.168.1.1,mountvers=3D= 3,mountport=3D4046,mountproto=3Dudp,local_lock=3Dnone,addr=3D192.168.1.1 >=20 >=20 > Note, I have time on my side here =85 we are doing a limit pilot over = the next month, but it isn't until Sep/Oct that this project goes live =85= what can we do to narrow down that gap?=20 >=20 > Thx >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CB53127E-9D0D-422A-924E-DD1C0D341646>