Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:49:06 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: bsdml <pietro.bsdml@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org" <wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org> Subject: Re: T40 bootloop on CAM status: Command timeout on both 10.1 and -CURRENT Message-ID: <CC9395C0-0B75-419E-B943-CCA7E5AAEEFA@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55198A31.4090203@gmail.com> References: <551748A4.1090303@gmail.com> <20150329092713.GA69272@lyxys.ka.sub.org> <55198A31.4090203@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:38, bsdml <pietro.bsdml@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > Hey wolfgang, >=20 > thanks for getting back to me. Adding hint.ata.1.disabled=3D"1" in /boot/d= evice.hints indeed did the trick and allowed me to boot both 10.1 and 11-CUR= RENT, however this workaround has temporary solved my problem but brings up t= o another headache. I have planned to get a bay caddy and swap the cdrom dri= ve with a 7.200 rpm SATA hdd, but doing this way disabling the second SATA c= hannel I will be unable to achieve such a thing. >=20 > Is there a chance that the bay caddy ATA will work without the need to dis= able the second ATA channel? Has a bug been filed for this issue?=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CC9395C0-0B75-419E-B943-CCA7E5AAEEFA>