Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:05:35 +0000 From: Gerard Seibert <carmel_ny@outlook.com> To: User questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gnupg and gnupg2 Message-ID: <CY1PR20MB0363D2E6765B7F258B1551DD801A0@CY1PR20MB0363.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <d27daccd-e064-4fb1-9809-a786c9b4345a@Spark> References: <CAPORhP46hhzQ8Nc-UR-E%2BdcaNtj7RX7uYq-gA8S99Gij%2B=rhdQ@mail.gmail.com> <d27daccd-e064-4fb1-9809-a786c9b4345a@Spark>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:58 -0400, Jim Ohlstein stated: =20 > On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler <dave.mehler@gmail.com>, > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and > > gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the > > gnupg2? > They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one > port that relies on each. Perhaps running "pkg info -r gnupg20" and "pkg info -r gnupg1" might help. Actually, the latest version in port is "gnupg-2.1.20" You might be able to remove the other two versions and just link to that one. --=20 Carmel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CY1PR20MB0363D2E6765B7F258B1551DD801A0>