Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 20:44:20 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org>, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Postponing the switch to TeXLive Message-ID: <D01D7E6A-C576-4DD8-9068-FD4D2F0E4CCD@grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20140724183817.GI55770@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <53D0D1DC.8000501@netfence.it> <44a97yskcw.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20140724183817.GI55770@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 24 Jul 2014, at 20:38, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> writes: >>=20 >>> I've read in /usr/ports/UPDATING that TeXLive is now the default. >>> Since I've no time to test it now, I'd like to stay with TeTeX for a >>> further litte while. >>>=20 >>> So I put "TEX_DEFAULT=3Dtetex" in /etc/make.conf; however this does not >>> seem to work: "portupgrade -R teTeX" tries (and obviously fail) to >>> convert everything to TeXLive. >>>=20 >>> Is it possible to avoid this for now? >>=20 >> Based on 20 seconds of searching /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.tex.mk, I think you >> just need to capitalize 'tetex'. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > No teTeX has been totally removed, as it it was not happily living along w= ith > TeXlive (leading to too many conflicts and complexity) >=20 > regards, > Bapt I'm using TeX quite extensively for business reasons as well as private purp= oses. Are there any known pitfalls when migrating from teTeX to TeXlive?=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D01D7E6A-C576-4DD8-9068-FD4D2F0E4CCD>