Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:51:33 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Maxim Ignatenko <gelraen.ua@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/163508: [rc.subr] [patch] Add " enable" and " disable" commands to rc.subr Message-ID: <D31DAF22-8941-4EAC-B05E-A860450F198E@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <CABWTX-Z71U2OVFt8mH2n7BVcKX9eYGnk9YWY7b53i-RQeMJKtA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201112241230.pBOCUF3h064098@freefall.freebsd.org> <CADLo83-SK%2Bo0b9GysjhH0N=TxsZXLRAuKL-n%2Btt6%2BCcr1gAJWQ@mail.gmail.com> <74F7E2CE-89DC-4F64-9A50-71B9FD458025@bsdimp.com> <CABWTX-Z71U2OVFt8mH2n7BVcKX9eYGnk9YWY7b53i-RQeMJKtA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 24, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Maxim Ignatenko wrote:
>> If the 5% of cases are when someone has done something complicated =
to the rc.conf file, then I don't care: they won't use this interface =
and we can detect this case and do nothing.
>=20
> Now I don't see how to distinguish cases when ${rcvar} set to default
> value in rc-script and when it's set in other file in some not obvious
> way.
What does that matter?
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D31DAF22-8941-4EAC-B05E-A860450F198E>