Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:10:25 +0000 From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: "<freebsd-net@freebsd.org>" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problems with two interfaces on the same subnet? Message-ID: <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F70A47C@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> In-Reply-To: <kfdvck$6ak$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <kfduar$qrh$1@ger.gmane.org> <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F70995D@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <kfdvck$6ak$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Feb 12, 2013, at 9:50, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: >> You can make this work with ipfw rules (and I guess also setfib, althoug= h I have not tried that.) >=20 > The concept of FIBs looks clean and applicable but setfib works on newly > started process, and I would need to do something like apply it to > packets coming from an interface. Assuming your default route is via igb2, you can do something like this: ipfw add fwd <router upstream of igb3> ip4 from <local address of igb3> to = not <subnet of igb2> out (From memory, no guarantees.) Lars=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F70A47C>