Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:23:40 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> Cc: mdf@FreeBSD.org, "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Include file search path Message-ID: <D6743558-51E0-46AE-926C-C692904AA02A@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikec9iYVtLMnJ2ovZvENhrFmt_V-g@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTi=BiUVnzsGg83wwWPHjnTDR=XukhJ3UK6Bd5hvF@mail.gmail.com> <4D934AF4.9080503@FreeBSD.org> <BB9CDEF6-5B59-47F3-8873-78D71E39BF3E@bsdimp.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1104021925110.67810@fledge.watson.org> <742085CD-7F6F-4879-9FFD-517EC3203D52@bsdimp.com> <F5CE9765-FFF0-439C-9156-51912EEE0C1C@freebsd.org> <5AF348C8-6AB6-490D-A12E-89A51528F58F@bsdimp.com> <BANLkTikec9iYVtLMnJ2ovZvENhrFmt_V-g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi Warner, >=20 > On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>=20 >> On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: >>=20 >>> On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote: >>>=20 >>>>> (2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. This seems like = a basic >>>>> requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's = not yet a >>>>> resolved issue? >>>>=20 >>>> 0 work has been done here to my knowledge. The world view for = clang and our in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge. >>>=20 >>> That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our = build integration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in = clang/LLVM? >>=20 >> Yes. The problem isn't hard, the cross compile paradigm is just a = little different. >>=20 >>>>> We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new = soft-core 64-bit MIPS platform. We're already using a non-base gcc for = our boot loader work, and plan to move to using clang/LLVM later in the = year. The base system seems a bit short on detail when it comes to the = above, currently. >>>>=20 >>>> Yes. I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close to = building with xdev compilers. A similar number are needed to make it = easy to configure and add systree support, I think. >>>=20 >>> Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just = works" state with regard to this? >>=20 >> I sure hope so. I'd like to have demoable stuff by BSDcan. >>=20 > BSDCan has passed, has there been any advance made since that = discussion ? It is "demonstrable" but not ready to commit to the tree. Needs about 4 = hours of work that I've had trouble scheduling on it due to work getting = busier than I expected. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D6743558-51E0-46AE-926C-C692904AA02A>