Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:24:39 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov <bland@freebsd.org> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: umass problem. Message-ID: <D75328A3-1C22-4277-987C-4B633DAF948E@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200911070109.28595.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <202969100caf7f0bb8098572b0dad622@mail> <20d8e6193795d83f9ffa30ab94bf86eb@mail> <200911070109.28595.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hans, It works. Perhaps you need to adjust debug output of ehci_poll_timeout () but otherwise it is fine. Just curious, is there is no way to detect lost interrupt in new usb stack quickly or check in the old one was not correct anyway? Thanks, Alexander. On 07.11.2009, at 9:09, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 06 November 2009 05:52:48 Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: >> Well I do. This is a regression in EHCI driver introduced along the >> new >> usb stack. Please review patch attached. >> >> Thanks, >> Alexander. >> > > Hi, > > Your patch has been committed to USB P4 with some modifications. > Please test! > > http://p4web.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=170302 > > --HPS > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > "
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D75328A3-1C22-4277-987C-4B633DAF948E>