Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Jan 2017 09:26:58 +0000
From:      "D. E" <cipher_nl@hotmail.com>
To:        Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru>, "fs@freebsd.org" <fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Poor ZFS performance
Message-ID:  <DB6PR0801MB1622E364F7E7BBA170ADCE6397700@DB6PR0801MB1622.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <083391de-d153-e0f6-c453-63d95d3e1f55@webmail.sub.ru>
References:  <083391de-d153-e0f6-c453-63d95d3e1f55@webmail.sub.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I'm writing lots of (tens of millions) relatively small files, hashing=20
>them out in three-level directory, 100 entries per level.

>Speed is quite unsatisfying, about 2 millions files per day writing in=20
>20 processes, that is, about one file per second for process.

But that is to be expected, isn't it? You have chosen hardware which is *EX=
TREMELY* slow for non-contiguous write access. The Seagate Archive HDD is a=
n SMR harddrive suitable for archive storage - not a generic PMR harddrive.=
 So the Seagate Archive HDD is suitable for makings backups and writing hug=
e files like 1TB images which you write from A to Z. SMR drives are notorio=
usly slow when it comes to non-contiguous writes, such as writing small fil=
es.

You can read warnings about SMR and the Seagate Archive HDD in particular e=
verywhere on the web. Have you missed them?

Slightly exaggerated: your SMR-drive is more like a tapestreamer than a rea=
l harddrive. It should be used to store enormous files and used for 'cold s=
torage'.

Read more about the Seagate Archive HDD on its website: http://www.seagate.=
com/enterprise-storage/hard-disk-drives/archive-hdd/

To be honest, it is the worst harddrive one can buy today for the purpose o=
f regular storage (hot storage). For cold storage, such as backups like tap=
estreamers do the drive is decent, but not good by any means. 1,33TB per pl=
atter is disappointing for SMR considering the massive downsides. And some =
PMR drives are even cheaper per gigabyte than this SMR drive. So i strongly=
 recommend against SMR at this time.

Regards,
CiPHER=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DB6PR0801MB1622E364F7E7BBA170ADCE6397700>