Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 12:25:16 -0800 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is openssl properly integrated to the FreeBSD? Message-ID: <E14Zf48-000HgW-00@rip.psg.com> References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0009271503020.32142-100000@hera.ik.bme.hu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009271301380.81104-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> There is an application called CA.pl with documentation in
>> /usr/src/crypto/apps/ directory and also it has a documentation (in
>> /usr/src/crypto/doc/apps) but none of them installed. It could be
>> installed in the /usr/bin or /usr/share/examples/ssl. Also there are lots
>> of documentation in /usr/src/crypto/doc/apps/ in *.pod format but only the
>> openssl.pod is installed? Any intention to integrate them to the FreeBSD
>> man pages or handbook? Or should I go on to make a diff to incorporate.
>
> Uncomment the following in /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto:
>
> #.for section in 1 3
> #.for pod in ${POD${section}}
> #.for target in ${pod:T:S/.pod/.${section}/g}
> #MAN${section}+= ${target}
> #CLEANFILES+= ${target}
> #all-man: ${target}
> #${target}: ${LCRYPTO_SRC}/../doc/${pod}
> # pod2man ${LCRYPTO_SRC}/../doc/${pod} > ${target}
> #.endfor
> #.endfor
> #.endfor
>
> and all the .pod documentation will be converted to manpages and
> installed. It is not done by default because the OpenSSL manpages spam
> copies of system manpages with openssl-specific utilities like passwd(1)
two questions
o if i want to install the binaries in as clean a fashion as possible,
what's the hack?
o might the decision on whether to install (destructive docs | binaries)
be better made in make.conf?
randy
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E14Zf48-000HgW-00>