Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:04:26 -0800 (PST) From: "Jeffrey Bouquet" <jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com> To: "current" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: in -current is svn still canonical? Message-ID: <E1keymg-00064i-S6@rmmprod07.runbox> In-Reply-To: <E1ker3S-00052V-39@mailfront22.runbox>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 02:48:32 +0000, "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6722@twc.com> =
wrote:
> from tech-lists:
>=20
> > As subject - is svn still canonical for -current or is it git now?
> > If it's not git now, when roughly is the intended switch?
>=20
> I recently updated FreeBSD doc, ports, src (current), and src12 (12-stabl=
e) using svn (not svnup or svnlite).
>=20
> But I read some time before that, FreeBSD current source would go on git,=
while other src trees (non-current), ports and doc would stay with svn for=
the time being, until git on current src is further tested and stabilized.
>=20
...........................................................................=
.......................
Can this be put up in a wiki page as well as in each UPDATING, referencing =
the wiki page?=20
something like=20
src - current dec 2020 now svn up /usr/src ... git ....=
svn cleanup .... git ... [ other svn-git...
src - stable may 2021 dec 2020 svn up /usr/ports
src -release july 2021=20=20=20
ports dec 2021
doc dec 2021
and an additional column as to when svn will become obsolete for each respo=
sitory?=20
and maybe an additional wiki page with all the svn > git translations one c=
an reasonably presume to
be of use ?=20=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1keymg-00064i-S6>