Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:31:23 +1030 From: "O'Connor, Daniel" <darius@dons.net.au> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>, FreeBSD-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r288983 - in head/sys/arm: arm include Message-ID: <E49BFEE2-F2E4-4DC2-BA08-1F2739CE842C@dons.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20151008063830.GN2257@kib.kiev.ua> References: <201510070912.t979Co21054138@repo.freebsd.org> <20151008053507.GD85040@server.rulingia.com> <20151008063830.GN2257@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 8 Oct 2015, at 17:08, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> = wrote: > First step actually is to make an effort to obtain the said support = code > and to read the license before looking at the single line of the code. > The App Note 98 stated that the code is 'provided with the note', but = I > failed to make any useful consequences of the statement. Downloading = http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.dai0098a/DAI0098.zip (linked at the bottom of = http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.dai0098a/index.html) = unpacks to a Windows installer :-/ There is a vfp-support-license.txt file I put here https://gist.github.com/DanielO/b83a7872a61251109de1 IANAL but it doesn't look BSD compatible. There are 2 CAB files in there, 'unshield' unpacks them OK but the = library is just binary so it seems useless. The 2 CAB files seem = identical contents but different MD5s (no idea why). Looking a bit more, I'm not sure what the library in it is actually for = - there is vfp_init.s which doesn't seem to actually DO that much. -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E49BFEE2-F2E4-4DC2-BA08-1F2739CE842C>