Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:11:27 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: Need input on preference on location of 3rd party tests vs FreeBSD tests Message-ID: <E5C29F6D-C632-4B7B-B8C8-0816C93DB7B7@gmail.com> References: <B1CE2158-B8C1-4D97-AB7A-031ADF55C435@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all, One of the things that I've done on my fork of FreeBSD is I've imported ATF test suites from NetBSD and I have integrated existing test suites from freebsd's tools/regression tree into Kyua as well. Due to the size and difference in test content/coverage, I pulled lib/libc and lib/msun from bother sources and integrated them into Kyua. What I did was I put the netbsd testcases into the tests/ subdirectory and put the FreeBSD test suites into a tests/legacy subdirectory. The goal was that the legacy directory would eventually be converted over to atf testcases and then could be removed once the conversion was complete. I'm not sure if this scheme makes sense though. Does anyone have a preference as to whether or not this makes sense? Thanks! -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E5C29F6D-C632-4B7B-B8C8-0816C93DB7B7>