Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:55:34 +0100 From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> To: "Daniel Kalchev" <daniel@digsys.bg>, "mxb" <mxb@alumni.chalmers.se> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow resilvering with mirrored ZIL Message-ID: <E5CCC8F551CA4627A3C7376AD63A83CC@multiplay.co.uk> References: <CABBFC07-68C2-4F43-9AFC-920D8C34282E@unixconn.com> <51D42107.1050107@digsys.bg> <2EF46A8C-6908-4160-BF99-EC610B3EA771@alumni.chalmers.se> <51D437E2.4060101@digsys.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Kalchev" <daniel@digsys.bg>
To: "mxb" <mxb@alumni.chalmers.se>
Cc: <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: Slow resilvering with mirrored ZIL
>
> On 03.07.13 16:36, mxb wrote:
>> Well, then my question persists - why I get so significant drop of speed while resilvering second drive.
>> The only changes to the system are:
>>
>> 1. Second partition for ZIL to create a mirror
>> 2. New disks are 7200rpm. old ones are 5400rpm.
>>
Its not something like the old disks are 512byte sectors
where as the new ones are 4k?
It this is the case having already replaced one disk you've
killed performance as its having to do lots more work reading
none 4k aligned data?
Regards
steve
================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it.
In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E5CCC8F551CA4627A3C7376AD63A83CC>