Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 23:27:44 -0500 From: Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> To: "freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org" <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org> Cc: Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net>, Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Subject: Re: Changes to kern.geom.debugflags? Message-ID: <EEB60849-3192-46E2-8626-EC6824182515@distal.com> In-Reply-To: <56B28B8A-2284-421D-A666-A21F995C7640@distal.com> References: <7AA0B5D0-D49C-4D5A-8FA0-AA57C091C040@distal.com> <6A0C1005-F328-4C4C-BB83-CA463BD85127@distal.com> <20121225232507.GA47735@alchemy.franken.de> <8D01A854-97D9-4F1F-906A-7AB59BF8850B@distal.com> <A947C892-5379-4F70-BFA0-0A7AB94DF0C6@distal.com> <6FC4189B-85FA-466F-AA00-C660E9C16367@distal.com> <20121230032403.GA29164@pix.net> <56B28B8A-2284-421D-A666-A21F995C7640@distal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 31, 2012, at 21:05 , Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> wrote:
> Okay. Well, I tried building stable/9 at revision 243673, which =
didn't work, and
> then 243242, which also failed in the same way. So, it may be =
something earlier
> than the suggested (if I'm reading your email correctly, and 243243 is =
where the
> rev you mentioned was integrated to stable/9.)
>=20
> Thanks much for the pointers! I'll try to take a look at some of the =
underlying
> changes, and see if anything looks more relevant.
So, now that we're past the holiday madness, and I haven't heard =
anything back
on this is there some other group or list I should ask the questions of =
ZFS internals
to figure out why the sparc64 MD boot loader code is seeing a =
dn_datablkszsec
of 0, and what it should be set to?
Thanks. I'm happy to compose another message to include people who =
might
be able to help. I'm out of my "comfort zone" in ZFS.
- Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EEB60849-3192-46E2-8626-EC6824182515>