Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:27:00 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Klaus_K=C3=BCchemann?= <maciphone2@googlemail.com>
To:        Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Showstoppers for RPI3
Message-ID:  <F4EB9ED4-017D-4CDC-A927-035E1C595CD4@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200226235908.GD22189@lonesome.com>
References:  <20200225175446.GA77976@www.zefox.net> <11951E01-EC13-4FBB-938A-AEB5700C4281@yahoo.com> <CACNAnaEiv5NZZz%2BxfETkhSZ-zbjZ3Ya6z7pyteheP4zj3EK1Gg@mail.gmail.com> <20200226052045.GA79939@www.zefox.net> <E866B6BE-7948-4412-82EF-999A2F8C0DF9@googlemail.com> <04e8e290e5d7bb810f76ece4ff33d6e1006e63cd.camel@freebsd.org> <280455B5-E201-494F-A4EB-2426A12B7E2C@googlemail.com> <20200226235908.GD22189@lonesome.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Mark,

> Am 27.02.2020 um 00:59 schrieb Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>:
>=20
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 05:11:35PM +0100, Klaus K=C3=BCchemann via =
freebsd-arm wrote:
>> but Ed Maste stated a clear aarch64->Tier1-roadmap
>=20
> I'll try not to speak for Ed here other than to say I know he often =
sees
> things from the "aarch64 server box installed in rack" view.  And IIUC
> we do fairly well on those.

No problem to install a bunch of crappy consumer boards into a =
server-rack :-).. just kidding..

> Mark Linimon
>=20
> The problem is that aarch64 has this bewildering variety of hardware;
> some very capable and well-documented, others not so.
>=20
> IMHO there's no possible way that we can be a first-class platform on
> every single arm board that's ever been made

It=E2=80=99s all better than we think, it=E2=80=99s just time consuming =
and a thing of organization=20
Maybe not for every board but for nearly every board which is worth ..

> Mark Linimon
>=20
>> and it looks funny when we fail in supporting devices while others do
>=20
> If NetBSD has drivers, then we should see if there is interest in =
porting
> them over.

Finally a reasonable attitude from someone here, Mark

> Mark Linimon
>=20
> (The number of people on the two projects differs a lot, especially =
w/rt
> non-x86 platforms, so it's kind of hard to say in general.  I do know =
we
> are ahead w/rt powerpc64.)
>=20
> But the real roadblock is the chips whose specs are under NDA.  No one
> seems to have any ideas of how to work around that.  So, if we can't
> work around it, and also can't port otherBSD drivers, we are stuck.

also OpenBSD is very successful active in this discipline=E2=80=A6
Today I=E2=80=99ve  got a Broadcom-Wifi-device to work (with an =
openbsd-driver-dev)

> Am 27.02.2020 um 01:03 schrieb Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>:
>=20
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 07:27:37AM -0600, Kyle Evans wrote:
>> This platform is on life support on FreeBSD with exactly maybe two
>> developers doing anything on it
>=20
> I am hoping that by "this platform" you mean RPI4?
>=20
> There are certainly more people working on the ports side than just 2.
>=20
>> it's highly demotivating to then receive comments like this.
>=20


> I've talked to Klaus as some length and I think part of all this is
> due to a language barrier.

Thanks Mark, yes, I say   sorry again to Kyle and Ian,
Kyle is the one who made the RPI4 booting,
who am I that I  could think I had the right to say something bad to him =
or other devs ?! .
I couldn't just explain in native English language what I meant..
Hopefully these sentences do work in yours native English language  :-)

>=20
> But it is *very* frustrating to have developers saying "we *must*
> have RPI4" and "we *cannot* have RPI4" -- even for someone like me
> whose only involvement is trying to update documentation.
>=20
> mcl

We`lll update the docs, for sure, there=E2=80=99s of course no must have =
for any gadget=20
But there are a lot which work and can be improved e.g. by adopting =
drivers from other BSDs,
If here are none available..=20

Thank you=20
Regards
Klaus









Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F4EB9ED4-017D-4CDC-A927-035E1C595CD4>