Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:34:50 +0000 From: Kamil Choudhury <Kamil.Choudhury@anserinae.net> To: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: opteron a1100 arm Message-ID: <F9A7386EC2A26E4293AF13FABCCB32B3015127368B@janus.anserinae.net> In-Reply-To: <52F2461B.1070405@m5p.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401311911120.2427@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1391538649.19169.79261269.3C5F49D1@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAFU734xXWyc_TqBJ7e4MhD2nB01BAejR_1vT9%2B_5Ar5mJncncA@mail.gmail.com> <493DEB39-C4B4-409E-B8B2-B1B11E013754@netgate.com> <60555.1391549390@critter.freebsd.dk> <23B18B88-D888-46B3-99F6-905F86E20FAF@netgate.com> <lcsqov$ui9$1@ger.gmane.org> <DCE7B22A-D51F-471A-B446-4B76D87E775D@netgate.com>, <52F2461B.1070405@m5p.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=0A= George wrote: =0A= > This discussion is very entertaining. But let's not lose sight of the=0A= > main point: ARM processors are not going away. It is to FreeBSD's=0A= > detriment if we don't have Tier 1 support for a processor that, by some= =0A= > guesses, already comprises the majority of new installations by count.=0A= =0A= Moving on to specifics, what concrete steps would be necessary to actually = =0A= get FreeBSD support for this architecture? =0A= =0A= _______________________________________________=0A= freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list=0A= http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers=0A= To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"= =0A=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F9A7386EC2A26E4293AF13FABCCB32B3015127368B>