Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:15:27 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> Subject: Re: Are ports supposed to build and run on 10-CURRENT? Message-ID: <FA7BE6E8-7A53-47BB-A64F-55BC7346AB78@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130624202326.2a6111a6@bsd64.grem.de> References: <20130613031535.4087d7f9@bsd64.grem.de> <EF830CD7-00F1-4628-8515-76133BBE85E7@FreeBSD.org> <C1CC40FC-4489-4164-96B7-5E1A25DCB37F@FreeBSD.org> <51C888C2.2040706@FreeBSD.org> <20130624202326.2a6111a6@bsd64.grem.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 24, 2013, at 20:23, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:58:26 +0200 > Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> Am 22.06.2013 00:27, schrieb Dimitry Andric: >> >>> Attached is a diff to fix the db5 port, so it correctly builds with >>> CXXFLAGS?=-std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++. Matthias, could you please >>> have a look at it? >> >> Does databases/db6 as a requisite make your failing port compile >> properly? > > The port failing to build using c++11 is databases/db5 itself. The port > depending on db5 that raised the question is devel/ice, which might > build with db6, but upstream only developed and tested it using > db5, so sticking to that version is preferred. Indeed, I should probably have sent this a separate mail, sorry. The diff was just to get db5 building with libc++. A similar diff is needed for db6, but before I start producing it, I would like to know if there is any interest. :-) Note the fixes are mostly trivial, just a renaming of a few identifiers. If you would rather have me take it upstream, please let me know. -Dimitry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FA7BE6E8-7A53-47BB-A64F-55BC7346AB78>