Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:59:24 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNGEGHFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <1337541312.20050212132519@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Anthony > Atkielski > Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 4:25 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... > > > The stabilities of NT-based systems and UNIX are roughly the same when > kernels are compared. How exactly does one do this when the NT kernel code isn't available for perusal? Other than, of course, just running both and assuming that because neither happens to crash running a screensaver, that they must be roughly the same. That's a marketing comparison which has no value. Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNGEGHFAAA.tedm>