Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 15:45:17 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD SCSI list) Cc: gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu (John-Mark Gurney) Subject: Re: Ideas on CD changers sought Message-ID: <Mutt.19970104154517.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970104042832.301D-100000@hydrogen.nike.efn.org>; from John-Mark Gurney on Jan 4, 1997 04:33:50 -0800 References: <Mutt.19970104124751.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> <Pine.NEB.3.95.970104042832.301D-100000@hydrogen.nike.efn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As John-Mark Gurney wrote: > I'm assuming I should combine it with the previous patch, correct? Not really. The ``add LUN to second command byte'' patch is gone, your counter-example proved that it's useless. But: this patch will only have any effect in your system as long as you keep the CD-ROM quirk record out that prevents multiple LUNs from being probed. If this patch works (i.e., i haven't done any trivial mistake), it doesn't endanger any production-level environment. The expected result is that the not really existant LUNs on your Chinon drives pop up as `uk0' through `uk12' or something like this, but no longer as bogus `sd' devices. `uk' devices are fairly harmless, almost the only thing you could do with them is sending direct SCSI commands. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970104154517.j>