Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:58:32 +0300
From:      Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>
To:        Josef Pojsl <jp@tns.cz>, Claudio Jeker <cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ospf cost and route selection (openospfd)
Message-ID:  <Ntfg81bhcEB6BPmKzMb2iTN9oBA@ebJhc%2B9glC7W5vxxBJVH9quBZr0>
In-Reply-To: <20080207141422.GG11393@diehard.n-r-g.com> <20080207074944.GA56085@bonifac.tns.cz>
References:  <20080206144104.GL1122@bonifac.tns.cz> <jV/l2UkZT%2BCCNuE6npJv1SBs5CE@UCvaDHSF%2BGDEPQ7TSpdR%2BlgUSQM> <20080207074944.GA56085@bonifac.tns.cz> <20080207141422.GG11393@diehard.n-r-g.com> <20080206144104.GL1122@bonifac.tns.cz> <jV/l2UkZT%2BCCNuE6npJv1SBs5CE@UCvaDHSF%2BGDEPQ7TSpdR%2BlgUSQM> <20080207074944.GA56085@bonifac.tns.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Josef, Claudio, good day.

Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:49:44AM +0100, Josef Pojsl wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for your remarks. I absolutely agree with you
> > that all columns are correct except the Nexthop.
> > 
> 
> The nexthop selection for point to point links had a bug in versions
> previous to 4.2. This should be fixed in the 4.2 and -current version of
> OpenOSPFD.

Thanks for confirming this: I had started to suspectethis after
some code digging.  Will try to update the port to 4.2, so expect
some patches "Really Soon" (tm) ;))
-- 
Eygene



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Ntfg81bhcEB6BPmKzMb2iTN9oBA>