Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:56:40 -0800
From:      "Joshua Lokken" <bsdaemon@eudoramail.com>
To:        freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org, "WolfRyder" <wolfryder@qwest.net>
Subject:   Re: Top posting
Message-ID:  <OECHLPPIMMKJHBAA@whowhere.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:56:10  
 WolfRyder wrote:
>I top-post when what I have to say is short and to the point. If I want to 
>comment on several different parts, I will interweave. The thing I really 
>really hate is to have to wade through several paragraphs, trying to read 
>what someone responds, and I give up. If I'm interested enough to be 
>following a thread, I'll have read the whole original post to begin with.
>
>Saves me time...the purists may disagree with me and that's okay. If we all 
>did things and like things the same way it would be a very boring world indeed.
>
>WolfRyder
>
>At 09:10 AM 2/27/03 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>X-Mailer: MailCity Service
>>
>>[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
>>
>>single line paragraph
>>
>>On Wednesday, 26 February 2003 at 11:38:51 -0800, Joshua Lokken wrote:
>> > Hey newbies
>> >
>> > Why do people not like topposting in replies?  It seems that (from
>> > my experience) that the business world in general _always_ topposts
>> > replies.
>>
>>It's rather like putting the cart before the horse.  I can distinguish
>>about four different styles:

>>
>>4.  The most obvious way to do things is to interleave individual
>>     parts of the message.  Thus you can have a blow-by-blow reply to
>>     individual points.  You don't forget anything, and people know
>>     what you're talking about in every case.  You can see an example
>>     of this further down in the same web page.
>>
>>So why don't people use 4 all the time?  For many, it's too much
>>trouble.  Maybe they can't type very well (not really much of a
>>reason; it's not much more work).  More likely, the tools at their
>>disposition aren't up to the job.  This is particularly true for
>>Microsoft-based systems, where I haven't been able to find any MUA
>>which allows you to write messages with a real editor.
>>
>>Greg
>>--
>>When replying to this message, please take care not to mutilate the
>>original text.
>>For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/email.html
>>See complete headers for address and phone numbers
>>Please note: we block mail from major spammers, notably yahoo.com.
>>See http://www.lemis.com/yahoospam.html for further details.

Yeah, that's what I has in mind when I asked the question, I guess.  Windows is the tool of choice at work, and while I have been mucking about with Cygwin, I haven't found an MUA that works very well, either.  Actually, a couple of months back I was using Opera, which has a decent mail interface.  I was told that since Opera changed the titles of attachments when it sent them, I _had_ to use Outlook Express!  I finally convinced the boss to allow me to use Outlook proper, but you see what I'm saying.... ;)  Thanks for the replies!

Joshua Lokken


Need a new email address that people can remember
Check out the new EudoraMail at
http://www.eudoramail.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?OECHLPPIMMKJHBAA>