Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:44:32 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8ystein_Kaldhol?= <Oystein.Kaldhol@mrfylke.no> To: "Francesco Comi" <frankk.ml@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: Ad: Proliant ML115 compatible? Message-ID: <OF7601E082.A1CFDEA2-ONC12572C9.0029D400-C12572C9.002A874A@mr-fylke.org> In-Reply-To: <9a2d73850704160709j2ec7fd46iecbd84ba6f7c3d0@mail.gmail.com> References: <9a2d73850704160709j2ec7fd46iecbd84ba6f7c3d0@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
owner-freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org wrote on 16.04.2007 16:09:37: > I'm going to buy an HP Proliant server ML115. This is the exact model: > http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/uk/en/sm/WF06b/ > 521-525-358265-358265-12083521-13153988-80068674.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_UKEN > > I'm wonderint particularly if the raid controller and the network ethernet > controller will work fine with FreeBSD 6.2 While we haven't tested this series in particular, we have tested the ML350 and the DL360(G4p) and DL380(G4). Both the network controllers and the raid controllers are detected and work fine. There is one caveat, and that is the fact that we have experienced deadlocks on these machines under high network stress, as discussed on this mailinglist earlier. Wether this is a driver problem related to the NIC, or some generic problem in the 6.1 and 6.2 kernels under high network load(we typically have 100k+ states in pf simultaneously) is uncertain at the moment. With more normal load, and in other roles than the router/fw role, the servers perform as expected. brgrds Oystein Kaldhol BOFH-in training County of More & Romsdal Norway
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?OF7601E082.A1CFDEA2-ONC12572C9.0029D400-C12572C9.002A874A>