Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 08:32:24 +0900 From: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> To: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: poudriere overlay: passing down git ENV variables (problem: self signed certificates) Message-ID: <PSAPR03MB563950ED69EB8944BD35AE7DFA9C9@PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <D2CA38AE-0323-4B82-9200-B075B5B6A6C4@freebsd.org> References: <3AED1ED6-2BDC-4615-8885-EBB7169D3F84@freebsd.org> <D2CA38AE-0323-4B82-9200-B075B5B6A6C4@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I looked into this wondering why the poudriere is not blocking the propagation of the value, but the poudriere is not being affected by the value. Then, I think that is the reason why we are not getting the results we need :) Of course, a better solution would be to set up the verification so that it does not need to be bypassed. Regards. Michael Gmelin wrote on 2022/08/04 07:58: >> Thanks, I simply copy and pasted what the requester used (assuming they already tested that exact value outside of poudriere), since my response was about the mechanics of how to get that variable in and not its name. >> > p.s. I also agree that adding the self signed cert to the trust bundle is preferable to just not checking ssl at all. Git allows configuring these setting per domain by the way. I learned today that there is a service called badssl.com, which provides a couple of subdomains to simulate various error scenarios, which is quite useful when testing.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?PSAPR03MB563950ED69EB8944BD35AE7DFA9C9>